Connections with Neighbors

An interconnected community is built upon trusting relationships among community members who support one another and communicate openly. Those living in neighborhoods high in mutual trust and willingness to help other community members report better overall health. “Closely knit” neighborhoods are more likely to exchange information, work together to achieve common goals, and reinforce those relationships. These relationships can help achieve the goals of crime prevention, cleaner public spaces, and discourage crime. Connections with neighbors encourage health by incentivizing outdoor interactions such as walking,[1] creating support systems, and promoting positive relationships for youth.[2]

Grassroots organizers are fostering healthy connections with neighbors by holding safe and nurturing multigenerational community spaces to build trust, whether that be in community gardens or in youth development and political education programs. They also contribute to healthy connections with neighbors by centering language justice in their work and by bringing together neighbors and community members to fight shared issues such as gentrification, displacement, pollution, food apartheid, and more.

DISPARITIES AND STATISTICS

Race and Ethnicity:

  • Ethnicity has been identified as a predictor of participation in organized activities. Experiences with ethnic discrimination, particularly for Latinx youth living in neighborhoods with a low percentage of Latinx families, can impede participation in organized activities.[3]

Socioeconomic Status:

  • Strong social connections and networks can mediate the effects of poverty, but neighborhoods with extreme income inequality can create conditions that break down social cohesion. Households displaced as a result of gentrification may experience disruption of protective social connections, resiliency strategies, and connections to place present in their former neighborhoods. [4]

Sexuality:

  • Adults in the LGBTQ community report lower levels of perceptions of living in close-knit neighborhoods, of the ability to count on their neighbors, of trust of their neighbors, and of people in their neighborhoods helping each other out compared to heterosexual individuals. Overall, LGBTQ adults report worse neighborhood cohesion across multiple measures.[5]

COMMUNITIES OF PRAXIS POLICIES

Community organizers across the nation are advocating for policy, system, environment, and practice changes that address the root causes of health inequities across the social determinants of health. Every year Praxis invites our Communities of Praxis members to share some of their top organizing or advocacy campaigns in their own communities through out annual survey.



 
 

[1] Ingram et al.,“Sociocultural Perceptions of Walkability in Mexican American Neighborhoods: Implications for Policy and Practice.” Journal of Transport & Health 7, no. B (December 2017): 172–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.001.

[2] RWJF. “Neighborhoods and Health,” May 1, 2011. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2011/05/neighborhoods-and-health-.html

[3] Simpkins et al.,“Socioeconomic Status, Ethnicity, Culture, and Immigration: Examining the Potential Mechanisms Underlying Mexican-Origin Adolescents’ Organized Activity Participation.” Developmental Psychology 49, no. 4 (April 2013): 706–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028399.

[4] Schnake-Mahl et al “Gentrification, Neighborhood Change, and Population Health: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Urban Health 97, no. 1 (February 1, 2020): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-019-00400-1.

[5] Henning Smith et al.“Differences by Sexual Orientation in Perceptions of Neighborhood Cohesion: Implications for Health.” Journal of Community Health 43, no. 3 (June 1, 2018): 578–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0455-z.